The Eco-Lodge and Wellness Campus: A Higher-Margin Alternative

The eco-lodge scenario occupies a smaller physical footprint than the resort, targets a higher ADR through wellness programme integration, and achieves stronger EBITDA margins through a direct booking and minimum-stay model. For developers who want institutional returns without the scale and capital requirement of the full resort programme, this is the model.

The Development Concept

Parameter Specification
Key count 22 keys 15 forest garden bungalows, 7 ridgeline view pavilions
Location Upper terraced zones of Stage 2 and lower section of Stage 3
Public areas Distributed open-air pavilion design no large single main building
Wellness programme Structured retreat curriculum: Balinese healing, yoga, guided nature immersion
F&B approach Farm-to-table using on-site agricultural produce from retained Subak terraces
Distribution model Direct booking primary; 3-night minimum stay from Year 2
Certifications targeted B-Corp, EDGE (IFC) both contribute to premium positioning and ESG investor narrative

Revenue Model Base Case

Revenue Line Assumption Annual AUD
Accommodation (22 keys) AUD 1,062/night, 64% occupancy 5,469,000
Wellness programme revenue Retreat packages and day programmes 970,000
Food and beverage (full-board option) Included in programme pricing 1,100,000
Total stabilised revenue (Year 5) 7,539,000
EBITDA (38 to 42% margin) Higher due to direct booking and on-site produce 2,865,000 to 3,166,000

IRR Scenarios (Levered, 50% Debt, Exit Year 10 at 13x EBITDA)

Scenario ADR (AUD) Occupancy Equity IRR Equity Multiple
Downside 850 55% 12.4% 2.7x
Base Case 1,062 64% 18.6% 4.5x
Optimistic 1,250 72% 24.1% 6.2x

Why the Wellness Premium Is Sustained

Explore the Eco-Lodge Financial Model

Full year-by-year projections, construction cost breakdown, and wellness programme revenue assumptions are available in the Developer Portal.